what tense to use in methodology

• Writing tips

Which Tenses to Use in the Methodology Chapter? Guide plus Examples

by Glenn Stevens

The Methodology chapter of your dissertation or research paper is critical for detailing how you conducted your study. It’s where you explain the steps you took to collect and analyze data, ensuring that your research can be understood and potentially replicated by others. The verb tense you use in this section is equally important, as it reflects the timeline of your research and helps maintain clarity. Here’s a breakdown of the tenses you should use in the Methodology chapter, along with examples.

1. Past Tense: Describing Completed Actions

The past tense is most commonly used in the Methodology chapter because you’re recounting actions that have already been carried out.

• To describe the specific steps you took during your research.
• To outline how data was collected, processed, or analyzed.
• The data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted with 30 participants.
• A survey was distributed to 500 respondents via an online platform.
• The samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography.

Using the past tense clearly indicates that these activities were part of your completed research process.

2. Present Tense: Describing Universally Accepted Methods or Rationales

The present tense is sometimes used to describe established methods or theoretical frameworks, especially if they are widely recognized and remain applicable beyond your study.

• When explaining why you chose a specific method.
• To discuss general principles or universally accepted techniques.
• Qualitative research is particularly suitable for exploring complex social phenomena.
• The thematic analysis approach allows researchers to identify patterns within qualitative data.
• Regression analysis is used to determine the relationship between dependent and independent variables.

This use of the present tense helps to emphasize that these methods are standard or timeless in your field.

3. Past vs. Present: Combining Both for Clarity

In some cases, you might need to switch between tenses to distinguish between actions you performed (past tense) and general statements about methodology (present tense).

• The participants were selected using purposive sampling because this approach is ideal for targeting specific demographics. Here, the past tense is used to describe your action ( participants were selected ), while the present tense is used to justify your method ( this approach is ideal ).

4. Future Tense: Rare but Possible

Although rare, the future tense might appear in the Methodology section if you’re writing a proposal or discussing steps you plan to take in ongoing or future research.

• In the next phase, data will be collected through follow-up interviews.

This usage is limited to proposals or research still in progress.

Key Tips for Consistency

• Stick to the timeline : Use past tense for actions already completed, and present tense for established facts or justifications.
• Be consistent within paragraphs : Avoid shifting tenses unnecessarily within the same paragraph unless there’s a clear reason (e.g., contrasting completed actions with universal principles).
• Review guidelines : Your institution or journal may have specific preferences for verb tenses, so check their requirements.

Examples of Correct Tense Usage in a Methodology Chapter

Example 1: clear use of past tense.

• The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, surveys were distributed to 300 participants. In the second phase, interviews were conducted with 20 selected respondents.

Example 2: Combining Past and Present Tense

• Participants were recruited using snowball sampling, which is widely used in qualitative research to identify hard-to-reach populations.

Example 3: Justifying Methods in Present Tense

• The content analysis method is appropriate for examining recurring themes in textual data.

Using the correct tense in your Methodology chapter enhances the clarity and professionalism of your writing. The past tense is your go-to choice for describing completed actions, while the present tense works well for general principles or widely accepted methods. In rare cases, you might use the future tense for planned research. By applying these guidelines tenses to use in the methodology chapter, you’ll ensure your chapter is both clear and grammatically precise.

Posted by Glenn Stevens. Need help editing your methodology chapter? Why not contact Glenn.

Share this:

Tags: academic writing methodology tenses

You may also like...

How to Beat AI Detectors: A Quick Guide

 by Glenn Stevens · Published

Can Turnitin Detect AI-Generated Text? Turnitin and ChatGPT

When should I write the Introduction chapter of my dissertation?

• Next story  The Use of Active and Passive Voice in Dissertation Writing
• Previous story  Dissertation verb tenses: What Tenses Should I Use in My Dissertation Chapters?

• Academic Writing Service
• Privacy Policy

Useful articles? Why not buy the author a coffee using the link below.

academic research academic writing AI Artificial intelligence case study ChatGPT data dissertation doctorate Editing ethical considerations ethics generalizability interviews Introduction leadership Literature review management masters methodology methods mixed methods Paraphrasing phd plagiarism proofreading proof reading psychology qualitative qualitative research quantitative quantitative research research research design researcher sampling student students supervisor survey technology theory undergraduate university Writing

How to Use Tenses within Scientific Writing

Written by: Chloe Collier

One’s tense will vary depending on what one is trying to convey within their paper or section of their paper. For example, the tense may change between the methods section and the discussion section.

Abstract --> Past tense

• The abstract is usually in the past tense due to it showing what has already been studied.

Example: “This study was conducted at the Iyarina Field School, and within the indigenous Waorani community within Yasuni National Park region.”

Introduction --> Present tense

• Example: “ Clidemia heterophylla and Piperaceae musteum are both plants with ant domata, meaning that there is an ant mutualism which protects them from a higher level of herbivory.”

Methods --> Past tense

• In the methods section one would use past tense due to what they have done was in the past.
• It has been debated whether one should use active or passive voice. The scientific journal Nature states that one should use active voice as to convey the concepts more directly.
• Example: “In the geographic areas selected for the study, ten random focal plants were selected as points for the study.”

Results --> Past tense

• Example: “We observed that there was no significant statistical difference in herbivory on Piperaceae between the two locations, Yasuni National Park, Ecuador (01° 10’ 11, 13”S and 77° 10’ 01. 47 NW) and Iyarina Field School, Ecuador (01° 02’ 35.2” S and 77° 43’ 02. 45” W), with the one exception being that there was found to be a statistical significance in the number count within a one-meter radius of Piperaceae musteum (Piperaceae).”

Discussion --> Present tense and past tense

• Example: “Symbiotic ant mutualistic relationships within species will defend their host plant since the plant provides them with food. In the case of Melastomataceae, they have swellings at the base of their petioles that house the ants and aid to protect them from herbivores.”
• One would use past tense to summarize one’s results
• Example: “In the future to further this experiment, we would expand this project and expand our sample size in order to have a more solid base for our findings.”

Verb tenses in scientific writing: Which tense should you use?

If you’re fluent in English, using tenses in scientific writing should come naturally to you. You shouldn’t need to flip through a grammar book, ask a freelance editor, or search online for “methods tense” or “literature review tense”.

But verb tenses may start to haunt you if you’re writing an article for a top peer-reviewed journal and you know you have to get every detail right. For example, you may wonder, What tense should be used in methodology sections? Should the introduction or literature review be written in the present tense or past tense?

In this post I’m going to answer these and other questions on verb tenses in scientific writing to make it easier for you to understand which tenses to use in a research paper.

Past or present tense in a cademic writing? It depends.

There’s  no consensus on how authors should be using verb tenses in scientific writing. Here is a summary of the main recommendations of academic writing experts on tenses in scientific writing.

Literature review verb tense

For the literature review, most academic editors recommend using the past simple or present perfect when talking about past research.

Use the past simple to discuss what was done in the past (the authors collected, investigated, analyzed, etc.).

Use present perfect to talk about findings from previous studies that are still valid today (the author has shown, has demonstrated, etc.).

If you don’t want to use the past simple or present perfect tense in literature review sections, your other option is the present simple tense. This is the so-called literary present.

Writing the literature review in the present simple tense helps simulate an ongoing academic conversation , to which you’re contributing (“Author et al. (2021) find…, discuss…, examine… imply…”).

In summary, what tense should the introduction be written in?

• Past simple or present perfect tense for past research
• Present simple for general truths or for the entire literature review section

Verb tenses in the methodology and results sections

For the methodology, almost all academic writing resources agree that the past simple tense is the logical choice. You are discussing what you did (collected data, analyzed them, and derived your results)—and all of that happened in the past.

However, you may also need to use the present simple tense to refer to figures and tables.

In summary, what tense should methods be written in?

For the methodology section, use these tenses:

• the past simple tense to explain your methods
• the present simple tense to refer to figures or tables

What tense should a discussion be written in?

Tenses for the discussion are similar to those for the introduction:

• past simple or present perfect tense when referring to what you did (past research)
• present simple for general truths or for interpretations of your data

Verb tenses in the conclusion section

For the conclusion, you may need to use several tenses. Again, when referring to general truths or implications of your results, use the present simple. When referring to what you did, use the past simple or present perfect tense.

Use the simple past when discussing the research you completed and is no longer continuing. Use the present perfect when discussing an action that started in the past and is still happening now, or an action that happens regularly.

So, for the conclusion, use these tenses:

• present simple for things that are true at the time of writing, the conclusions of your study, and its implications
• past simple or present perfect tense for past work

Knowing how to use verb tenses in scientific writing is better than imitating other authors

In scientific writing, using verb tenses inconsistently or unnecessarily shifting tenses means sloppy writing. A poorly written manuscript submitted to a peer-reviewed journal will come back with a long list of revisions—if it’s accepted for publication. Hiring a freelance editor for research papers can help you polish your writing style and improve the likelihood that your manuscript will be accepted the second time.

If you don’t want to hire a freelance editor, you may need to edit your own research paper . Mastering verb tenses in scientific writing will help you make the right choice for each section of your paper.

Try to resist the temptation to imitate others’ writing style. It’s common for new authors to learn academic writing the same way they learned to speak: by imitation. They peruse some articles published in their target journal to see what verb tenses other authors used and then make the same choices.

However, this is not such a great idea, because not all published articles are examples of good writing. You risk imitating an author that didn’t pay much attention to verb tenses in scientific writing, or whose work was edited by someone with little experience.

How to choose the right verb tenses for a research paper

If emulating others’ writing style comes with the risk of picking up bad habits, how do you choose the right verb tense to use in a scholarly paper?

Unfortunately, style guides, academic writing books, and academic editors give conflicting advice. A solution to this problem is to follow the recommendations of your university’s writing center if you’re writing a PhD thesis or dissertation. If, however, you’re writing a research paper for a journal, follow its guidelines.

Some publishers may let you choose any style guide as long as you’re consistent. In that case, go with the style popular in your academic field (for example, APA Style in social sciences).

Example: Verb tenses in APA Style

If you need to follow the APA Style, it has precise instructions on using verb tenses in research papers:

• Introduction and literature review: To talk about previous studies, use the past simple or present perfect; for findings that continue to be true, use the present simple.
• Methodology and results: To talk about your methods or results, use the past simple or present perfect.
• Conclusions: Write the conclusions of your research and implications of your findings in the present simple.

Here are some examples to help you understand how to use verb tenses in APA:

• Past simple tense to discuss past work:

Author A (2017) showed that varied populations display similar patterns, but Author B demonstrated that patterns vary wildly

• Present perfect to discuss findings from previous studies that are still valid today:

Other researchers have described similar processes in other environments

• Present simple to express general truths, facts, or ideas accepted today:

Most researchers agree that our species appeared in Africa

• Present perfect or past simple tense to describe your methods and results:

We have observed no variation in the economic growth rate, but found it depends on several factors

• Present simple tense to describe the conclusions and implications of your study:

Our results indicate a strong correlation between A and B, but we need further research in this area

Use the right tenses in scientific writing for clarity

The goal of using the right verb tenses in scientific writing is clarity. So, whether you follow your instincts, your advisor’s suggestions, an editor’s recommendations, or a style guide, aim at clarity and logic. A well-written manuscript will have a better chance of being accepted for publication. Also, it won’t require several rounds of revision to improve its language, meaning you save time and can focus on your science.

Do you need to hire a freelance editor for a research paper? Send me a message at [email protected].

Related posts:

• Write your research paper outline
• Should I edit my own research paper?
• Academic editing tips I wish I knew as a research scientist

Last revised on 23 June 2022

About Cristina N.

A freelance editor and writer with a keen interest in science, nature, and communication, I love to craft articles that help and inspire people.

Why your grammar checker can’t make documents perfect

Aim: help and inspire people to improve their written communications.

Neagu Raluca-Cristina | VAT Registration Number: IT04535070264

© 2015–2024 Neagu Raluca-Cristina

• PROOFREADING
• TERMS OF SERVICE
• PRIVACY POLICY
• TESTIMONIALS

• [email protected]

Mastering Tense Usage in Research Papers: A Section-by-Section Guide

Using the right verb tense is key in good academic writing . It’s like the hero no one talks about, making sure your paper looks solid next to others. Research shows that simple present, simple past, and present perfect are the most used tenses in research. Knowing how to use these tenses well shows you’re good with grammar. It also makes your writing clear and easy to follow.

Quick-Tips- Mastering Tense Usage in Research Papers

There’s a way to make tense use easier and even fun. By breaking down each part of your paper, we’ll show you how to handle tense. Let’s get started on making tense use in research papers something you can understand and maybe even like.

Key Takeaways

• Correct verb tense usage enhances academic credibility and clarity of expression in research papers.
• The simple present, simple past, and present perfect are the most utilized tenses in academic writing .
• Each section of a research paper has its preferred tense to maintain consistency and coherence.
• A well-structured methods section with accurate tense usage is crucial for research validity and reliability.
• Mastering verb tenses can transform the readability and impact of your research paper.

Introduction to Verb Tenses in Academic Writing

Mastery of verb tenses is key in academic writing. It helps make things clear and impactful. A study on using verb tenses in research papers got a lot of attention, showing their significance. Using tenses right makes research papers easier to read. It helps readers understand when things happened and their importance.

Why Verb Tenses Matter

Correct verb tenses set the right order and make research clear. The right tense at the start prevents confusion. This makes sure people understand the research well. Using tenses the same way keeps a clear timeline. This stops misunderstandings and keeps the research’s trustworthiness.

Overview of Common Verb Tenses

There are six main tenses in academic writing:

• Simple Present tense: Used for current actions or habits.
• Present Continuous tense: Shows ongoing actions now.
• Simple Past tense: Talks about finished actions in the past.
• Past Continuous tense: Focuses on actions happening over time in the past.
• Simple Future tense: Tells about actions that will happen.
• Future Continuous tense: Points to actions that will be happening over time.

For general statements in academic writing, the simple present tense is common. The present continuous tense is used for actions happening now. This is used less but still has its place. When talking about events that are finished, the simple past tense is fitting. For ongoing actions in the past, the past continuous tense is used. Future tenses are for predicting events to come.

The use of these tenses is very important in academic writing. Getting them right in a research paper makes it clear, builds trust, and shares the research’s impact well.

Choosing the Appropriate Tense for Different Sections

It’s key to use tenses correctly in academic writing. Doing so keeps your work clear and professional. Choose the tense that fits each part of your study well. Make sure to use the same tense throughout your paper.

Establishing Consistency

Using tenses right helps tell your research’s story clearly. Use the present for what’s happening now, the past for what’s done, and the future for newer ideas. This makes your study easy to follow. Here’s an example: “The enzyme activity increases with temperature.” Then, “Scientists found this in a lab test.” Finally, “Many studies have shown this works well.”

• Present tense: Ideal for general facts and ongoing research. Example: “Insulin and glucagon regulate blood glucose levels.”
• Simple past tense: Used for describing completed research activities. Example: “Scientists in Wales discovered a new enzyme in the liver.”
• Present perfect tense: Connects past studies with ongoing research. Example: “Many studies have focused on glucagon as an important regulating hormone.”

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Many writers struggle to keep tenses consistent. They might mix tenses without a clear plan. For example, “The research examined the data and shows a significant pattern” confuses readers. To avoid this, stick to the rules for each part of your paper, like using past tense for methods and present for results.

“Tense consistency is key to maintaining the narrative flow and professionalism in your academic writing.” – Dr. Jane Smith, Linguistics Professor

Learning to use tenses well can make your academic writing better. By following these tips, you can make your work more clear and precise.

Verb Tenses in the Introduction Section

Understanding how to use tenses in the introduction of a research paper is key. It ensures the reader knows where the information stands. This makes the reader clear on when and why the information matters.

Present Tense for Established Knowledge

The present tense is important in the introduction. It’s great for stating known facts and common truths. This makes your paper sound up-to-date and follows academic writing norms.

“Photosynthesis is a process used by plants to convert light energy into chemical energy.”

This tense choice shows the basic info your study is built on. It helps readers place your work in the wider knowledge landscape.

Using Past Tenses for Historical Context

Past and present perfect tenses are used for historical background. The simple past tells about finished studies, while the present perfect links past research to the present.

• Simple Past : “Smith (2018) found that the new medication reduced symptoms by 35%.”
• Present Perfect : “Researchers have consistently shown an interest in the effects of sleep on cognitive function.”

Applying these tenses well stitches together past and current studies. This highlights the progress and continuing discovery in your field.

Using the right tenses in your introduction isn’t just about rules. It’s about guiding your readers and setting up a strong base for your research. Let’s apply these principles to improve how we write the introduction of our research papers.

Verb Tenses in the Literature Review Section

We mix verb tenses well in the literature review. This mix helps make past research and its importance now clear. It’s key in doing a good previous studies check and showing a smooth current knowledge summary.

Past Tense for Previous Studies

The literature review mainly uses past tense for looking back. This approach lets us talk about studies that have already happened. For example, we might say “Smith (2010) found that more study time boosted grades.” This makes the old study clear and gives it history.

Present Tense for Current Knowledge

However, we mostly use present tense for talking about lasting theories and ideas. This method is essential in the current knowledge blend. Phrases like “Now, studies show that social media changes how we learn” connect the old and new, showing a full view of research talks.

Getting the right literature review tense isn’t just about being correct. It’s also about telling a story that values both old and new research.

Methodology Section: Best Tense Practices

Getting the tense right in the methodology section is crucial. It’s usually best to use the simple past tense. This tense works well to talk about the research steps that are already complete. Using the right methodology tense helps to be clear. It also makes it easier for others to do the same study.

Imagine talking about how you collected data. You might say, “We conducted a survey… “. This isn’t just about telling what happened. It keeps the section clear and accurate. Using good tense practices helps to explain your research method better.

Now, what if you’re writing a research proposal? Here, it’s good to use the future tense. For example, you might write, “We will use a randomized control trial… “. This clearly shows your planned steps. It makes your proposal more persuasive and well-organized.

Using different tenses can confuse people. So, when you write about your methodology tense , keep it consistent. This helps your section sound professional and be easy to understand.

“Consistent tense usage in the methodology section propels readers effortlessly through your research steps, maintaining a seamless narrative,” says our go-to grammar guru.

Let’s break it down for more clarity:

To sum up, using the right methodology tense is very important. It can really help or hurt your research methodology explanation . By carefully using these tense tips, readers can easily understand our research methods.

Results Section: Maintaining Consistency

The results section is a special place in our research work. It’s where we share our hard-earned outcomes. We do this with very careful steps to keep everything clear and steady. Using the right tense, like talking in past time, helps us tell the story of our findings correctly and plainly.

A good results section shows our data clearly. According to Labani, Wadhwa, & Asthana (2017), the focus is on sharing the real outcomes of our work. It’s not just tossing numbers around. It’s about being so clear that anyone can understand what the numbers mean.

Things like tables and charts are key in this. They’re much more than just filling up space. They help us make our data easy to see and understand. Let’s check out some cool stats that can make our points strong:

These numbers show our findings are rock solid. Take the relapse risk, for example. We found it increases by 2.1 times with a tight confidence range. Such clear stats make our study’s strong points even stronger.

Being clear and to the point with our words is key in the results section. We should keep our sentences simple and straight. Each data point should add to our story. This helps paint a full picture of what we’ve found.

Finally, review and revision are super important. Double-checking our work keeps it free of mistakes and messy bits. This is crucial for keeping our work consistent and sharing our findings in the best possible way.

Tense Usage in Discussion Section

The discussion section in a research paper is key for using tense well. It helps make our points clearer and stronger. This part gets a lot of attention, with 211,445 views on the Wordvice article about it. When we mix tenses, we tie our results to what’s already known and point out what they mean now.

Connecting Findings with Past Studies

We use the simple past tense to link our findings with past research. For instance, we might say, “Previous research showed a positive link between X and Y.” Doing this places our new results in the context of what we already know. It shows we get the field and respect the work done before us.

Present Tense for Current Implications

When discussing what our results could mean now, we often use the present tense. Like, “These findings suggest a new treatment approach.” This shows our research fits into the latest science discussions. It also highlights the possible use of our work now. And, if we’re making future guesses or talking about new research plans, using the future tense helps make these ideas clear.

Conclusion Section: Summarizing Key Points with Proper Tense

The conclusion wraps up our research clearly. It makes sure our readers get the main points and sees the study’s importance today.

Past Tense for Completed Work

We use the past tense to talk about what we’ve finished. It helps us sum up our journey and the big discoveries. This tense closes our story by showing what we’ve achieved.

Present Tense for Ongoing Research

Conversely, the present tense is for what’s still happening from our work. It points out our findings’ ongoing impact and areas needing more study. This keeps our summary alive, not just in the past but now and maybe in the future too.

While short, the conclusion is vital for the study’s message. Using the right tense makes our work’s importance clear. It’s how we can be memorable and show the study matters in the academic world.

Why do verb tenses matter in academic writing?

What are the most commonly used verb tenses in research papers, how do we ensure consistency in verb tense usage, what are some common mistakes to avoid, what tense should be used in the introduction section, how should we approach verb tenses in the literature review section, what is the best tense practice for the methodology section, which tense should be used in the results section, what is the proper tense usage for the discussion section, how should tenses be used in the conclusion section.

• ← Effective Use of Active and Passive Voice in Scientific Manuscripts
• Subject-Verb Agreement in Complex Academic Sentences →

Privacy Overview

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• 6. The Methodology
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Resources
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

The methods section describes actions taken to investigate the research problem and the rationale for the application of specific procedures or techniques used to identify, select, process, and analyze information applied to understanding the problem, thereby, allowing the reader to critically evaluate a study’s overall validity and reliability. The methodology section of a research paper answers two main questions: How was the data collected or generated? And, how was it analyzed? The writing should be direct and precise and always written in the past tense.

Kallet, Richard H. "How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper." Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004): 1229-1232; "Writing a Methods Section." In The Student Survival Guide for Research Methods in Psychology , Ross A. Seligman and Lindsay A. Mitchell. (New York: Routledge, 2021), pp. 76-81.

Importance of a Good Methodology Section

You must explain how you obtained and analyzed your results for the following reasons:

• Readers need to know how the data was obtained because the method you chose affects the results and, by extension, how you interpreted their significance in the discussion section of your paper.
• Methodology is crucial for any branch of scholarship because an unreliable method produces unreliable results and, as a consequence, undermines the value of your analysis of the findings.
• In most cases, there are a variety of different methods you can choose to investigate a research problem. The methodology section of your paper clearly articulates the reasons why you have chosen a particular procedure or technique.
• The reader wants to know that the data was collected or generated in a way that is consistent with accepted practice in the field of study. For example, if you are using a multiple choice questionnaire, readers need to know that it offered your respondents a reasonable range of answers to choose from.
• The method must be appropriate to fulfilling the overall aims of the study. For example, you need to ensure that you have a large enough sample size to be able to generalize and make recommendations based on the findings.
• The methodology should discuss the problems that were anticipated and the steps you took to prevent them from occurring. For any problems that do arise, you must describe the ways in which they were minimized or why these problems do not impact in any meaningful way your interpretation of the findings.
• In the social and behavioral sciences, it is important to always provide sufficient information to allow other researchers to adopt or replicate your methodology. This information is particularly important when a new method has been developed or an innovative use of an existing method is utilized.
• In a qualitative study, the reader needs to know that standard protocols concerning how you treated any human subjects were correctly followed [e.g., people you observed and interviewed] and how you controlled for your presence in the study as the primary instrument for gathering information during interactions with respondents.

Bem, Daryl J. Writing the Empirical Journal Article. Psychology Writing Center. University of Washington; Denscombe, Martyn. The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects . 5th edition. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 2014; Lunenburg, Frederick C. Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2008; "Writing a Methods Section." In The Student Survival Guide for Research Methods in Psychology , Ross A. Seligman and Lindsay A. Mitchell. (New York: Routledge, 2021), pp. 76-81; Praharaj, Samir Kumar, and Shahul Ameen. "Writing the Methods Section in a Manuscript." Kerala Journal of Psychiatry 34 1 (January-June 2021): 79-83.

Structure and Writing Style

I.  Groups of Research Methods

There are two main groups of research methods in the social sciences:

• The e mpirical-analytical group approaches the study of social sciences in a similar manner that researchers study the natural sciences . This type of research focuses on objective knowledge, research questions that can be answered yes or no, and operational definitions of variables to be measured. The empirical-analytical group employs deductive reasoning that uses existing theory as a foundation for formulating hypotheses that need to be tested. This approach is focused on explanation.
• The i nterpretative group of methods is focused on understanding phenomenon in a comprehensive, holistic way . Interpretive methods focus on analytically disclosing the meaning-making practices of human subjects [the why, how, or by what means people do what they do], while showing how those practices arrange so that it can be used to generate observable outcomes. Interpretive methods allow you to recognize your connection to the phenomena under investigation. However, the interpretative group requires careful examination of variables because it focuses more on subjective knowledge.

In both groups of research methods, the outcomes of applying methodological techniques for gathering and interpreting information are referred to as "findings" or "results."

II.  Content

The introduction to your methodology section should begin by restating the research problem and the theory and underlying assumptions underpinning your study. This is followed by situating the methods you used to gather, analyze, and process information within the overall “tradition” of your field of study and within the particular research design you have chosen to study the problem [i.e., In this case study, I conducted a content analysis of..."]. If the method you choose lies outside of the tradition of your field [i.e., the review of the literature demonstrates that the method is not commonly used], provide a justification for how your choice of methods specifically addresses the research problem in ways that could reveal new insights or understandings. Explain why is this approach important but do not interpret the outcomes until the discussion section of your paper.

The remainder of your methodology section should describe the following:

• Decisions made in selecting the data you have analyzed or, in the case of qualitative research, the subjects and research setting you have examined,
• Tools and methods used to identify and collect information, and how you identified relevant variables,
• The ways in which you processed the information and the procedures you used to analyze that information, and
• The specific research tools or strategies that you utilized to study the underlying hypothesis and research questions.

In addition, an effectively written methodology section should:

• Re-introduce the overall methodological approach for investigating your research problem . Is your study qualitative or quantitative or a combination of both (mixed method)? Are you going to take a special approach, such as action research, or a more neutral stance?
• Indicate how the approach fits the overall research design . Your methods for gathering information should have a clear connection to the research problem. In other words, make sure that your methods will actually address the problem. One of the most common deficiencies found in research papers is that the proposed methodology is not suitable to achieving the stated objective of your paper.
• Describe the specific methods for collecting information that you used , such as, surveys, interviews, questionnaires, observation, archival research, etc. If you are analyzing existing information, such as a data set or archival documents, describe how it was originally created or gathered and by whom. Also be sure to explain how older data is still relevant to investigating the current research problem.
• Explain how you intend to analyze your results . Will you use statistical analysis? Will you use specific theoretical perspectives to help you analyze a text or explain observed behaviors? Describe how you plan to obtain an accurate assessment of relationships, patterns, trends, distributions, and possible contradictions found in the data.
• Provide background and a rationale for methodologies that are unfamiliar for your readers . Very often in the social and behavioral sciences, research problems and the methods for investigating them require more explanation and rationale than widely accepted rules governing the natural and physical sciences. Be clear and concise in your explanation.
• Provide a justification for subject selection and sampling procedure . For instance, if you propose to conduct interviews, how do you intend to select the sample population? If you are analyzing texts, which texts have you chosen, and why? If you are using statistics, why is this set of data being used? If other data sources exist, explain why the data you chose is most appropriate to addressing the research problem.
• Provide a justification for case study selection . A common method of analyzing research problems in the social sciences is to analyze specific cases. These can be a person, place, event, phenomenon, or other type of subject of analysis that are either examined as a singular topic of in-depth investigation or multiple topics of investigation studied for the purpose of comparing or contrasting findings. In either approach, you should explain why the case or cases were chosen and how they relate to understanding the research problem.
• Describe potential limitations . Are there any practical limitations that could affect your data collection? How will you attempt to control for potential confounding variables and errors? If your methodology may lead to problems you can anticipate, state this openly and show why pursuing this methodology outweighs the risk of these problems cropping up.

NOTE:   Once you have written all of the elements of the methods section, subsequent revisions should focus on how to present those elements as clearly and as logically as possibly. The description of how you prepared to study the research problem, how you gathered the information, and the protocol for analyzing the information should be organized chronologically. For clarity, when a large amount of detail must be presented, information should be presented in sub-sections according to topic. If necessary, consider using appendices for raw data.

ANOTHER NOTE: If you are conducting a qualitative analysis of a research problem , the methodology section generally requires a more elaborate description of the methods used as well as an explanation of the processes applied to gathering and analyzing the information than is generally required for studies using quantitative methods. Because you are the primary instrument for generating the information [e.g., through interviews or observations], the process for collecting that information has a significantly greater impact on producing the findings. Therefore, qualitative research requires a more detailed description of the methods used.

YET ANOTHER NOTE:   If your study involves interviews, observations, or other qualitative techniques involving human subjects , you may be required to obtain approval from the USC's Office for the Protection of Research Subjects before beginning your research. This is not a common procedure you need to follow for research and writing assignments in undergraduate classes. However, i f your professor states you need approval, you must include a statement in your methods section that you received official endorsement and adequate informed consent from the office and that there was a clear assessment and minimization of risks to participants and to the university. This statement informs the reader that your study was conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. In some cases, the approval notice is included as an appendix to your paper.

III.  Problems to Avoid

Irrelevant Detail The methodology section of your paper should be thorough but concise. Do not provide any background information that does not directly help the reader understand why a particular method was chosen, how the information was gathered or obtained, and how that information was analyzed in relation to the research problem [note: analyzed, not interpreted! Save how you interpreted the findings for the discussion section]. With this in mind, the page length of your methods section will generally be less than any other section of your paper except the introduction and conclusion.

Unnecessary Explanation of Basic Procedures Remember that you are not writing a how-to guide about a particular method. You should make the assumption that readers possess a basic understanding of how to investigate the research problem on their own and, therefore, you do not have to go into great detail about specific methodological procedures. The focus should be on how you applied a method , not on the mechanics of doing a method. An exception to this rule is if you select an unconventional methodological approach; if this is the case, be sure to explain why this approach was chosen and how it enhances the overall process of discovery.

Problem Blindness It is almost a given that you will encounter problems when collecting or generating your data, or, gaps will exist in existing data or archival materials. Do not ignore these problems and pretend they did not occur. Often, documenting how you overcame obstacles can form an interesting part of how you gathered information and where gaps may exist for future research. It demonstrates to the reader that you can provide a cogent rationale for the decisions you made to minimize the impact of any problems that arose.

Literature Review Just as the literature review section of your paper provides an overview of sources you have examined while researching a particular topic, the methodology section should cite any sources that informed your choice and application of a particular method [i.e., the choice of a survey should include any citations to the works you used to help construct the survey].

It’s More than Sources of Information! A description of a research study's method should not be confused with a description of the sources of information. Such a list of sources is useful in and of itself, especially if it is accompanied by an explanation about the selection and use of the sources. The description of the project's methodology complements a list of sources in that it sets forth the organization and interpretation of information emanating from those sources.

Azevedo, L.F. et al. "How to Write a Scientific Paper: Writing the Methods Section." Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia 17 (2011): 232-238; Blair Lorrie. “Choosing a Methodology.” In Writing a Graduate Thesis or Dissertation , Teaching Writing Series. (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers 2016), pp. 49-72; Butin, Dan W. The Education Dissertation A Guide for Practitioner Scholars . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2010; Carter, Susan. Structuring Your Research Thesis . New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012; Kallet, Richard H. “How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper.” Respiratory Care 49 (October 2004):1229-1232; Lunenburg, Frederick C. Writing a Successful Thesis or Dissertation: Tips and Strategies for Students in the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2008. Methods Section. The Writer’s Handbook. Writing Center. University of Wisconsin, Madison; Rudestam, Kjell Erik and Rae R. Newton. “The Method Chapter: Describing Your Research Plan.” In Surviving Your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process . (Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 2015), pp. 87-115; What is Interpretive Research. Institute of Public and International Affairs, University of Utah; Writing the Experimental Report: Methods, Results, and Discussion. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University; Methods and Materials. The Structure, Format, Content, and Style of a Journal-Style Scientific Paper. Department of Biology. Bates College.

Writing Tip

Statistical Designs and Tests? Do Not Fear Them!

Don't avoid using a quantitative approach to analyzing your research problem just because you have anxiety about applying statistical designs and tests. A qualitative approach, such as conducting interviews or content analysis of archival texts, can yield exciting new insights about a research problem, but it should not be undertaken simply because you have a disdain for running a simple regression. A well designed quantitative research study can often be accomplished in very clear and direct ways, whereas, a similar study of a qualitative nature usually requires considerable time to analyze large volumes of information and a tremendous burden to create new paths for analysis where previously no path associated with your research problem had existed.

To locate data and statistics, GO HERE .

Another Writing Tip

Knowing the Relationship Between Theories and Methods

There can be multiple meanings associated with the term "theories" and the term "methods" in social sciences research. A helpful way to delineate between them is to understand "theories" as representing different ways of characterizing the social world when you research it and "methods" as representing different ways of generating and analyzing information about that social world. Framed in this way, all empirical social sciences research involves theories and methods, whether they are stated explicitly or not. However, while theories and methods are often related, it is important that, as a researcher, you deliberately separate them in order to avoid your theories playing a disproportionate role in shaping what outcomes your chosen methods produce.

Introspectively engage in an ongoing dialectic between the application of theories and methods to help enable you to use the outcomes from your methods to interrogate and develop new theories, or ways of conceptually framing the research problem. This is how scholarship grows and branches out into new intellectual territory.

Reynolds, R. Larry. Ways of Knowing. Alternative Microeconomics . Part 1, Chapter 3. Boise State University; The Theory-Method Relationship. S-Cool Revision. United Kingdom; Dulock, Helen L., and William L. Holzemer. "Substruction: Improving the Linkage from Theory to Method." Nursing Science Quarterly 4 (Summer 1991): 83-87.

Yet Another Writing Tip

Methods and the Methodology

Do not confuse the terms "methods" and "methodology." As Schneider notes, a method refers to the technical steps taken to do research . Descriptions of methods usually include defining and stating why you have chosen specific techniques to investigate a research problem, followed by an outline of the procedures you used to systematically select, gather, and process the information [remember to always save the interpretation of information for the discussion section of your paper].

The methodology refers to a discussion of the underlying reasoning why particular methods were used . This discussion includes describing the theoretical concepts that inform the choice of methods to be applied, placing the choice of methods within the more general nature of academic work, and reviewing its relevance to examining the research problem. The methodology section also includes a thorough review of the methods other scholars have used to study the research problem.

Bryman, Alan. "Of Methods and Methodology." Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 3 (2008): 159-168; Schneider, Florian. “What's in a Methodology: The Difference between Method, Methodology, and Theory…and How to Get the Balance Right?” PoliticsEastAsia.com. Chinese Department, University of Leiden, Netherlands.

• << Previous: Scholarly vs. Popular Resources
• Next: Qualitative Methods >>
• Last Updated: Nov 28, 2024 1:46 PM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

Mastering the Use of Tenses in Your Research Paper 

Many students and early career researchers find themselves grappling with various aspects of academic writing. One critical aspect is ensuring correct grammar, most importantly the appropriate use of tenses in your research paper. In this article, we explain the basics of using tenses in scientific writing and list best practices for different sections of your academic manuscript. By understanding the role of tenses in your research paper and applying them accurately, you can enhance the clarity and credibility of our research work. 

Table of Contents

• Understanding the basics: Using tenses in research papers 
• The simple past tense: Literature review, methods 
• The past perfect tense: Methods, conclusion 
• The simple present tense: Introduction, results, tables and figures  
• The present perfect tense: Introduction, literature review 
• The future tense: Discussion, conclusions 
• How Paperpal can help you ensure correct usage of verb tenses in academic writing?  

Understanding the basics: Using tenses in research papers

Tenses in scientific writing serve as valuable tools to indicate the time frame in which certain actions or ideas take place. The simple past tense and simple present tense are the most used tenses in research papers. They are supplemented by the present perfect, past perfect, and occasionally the future tense. Consistency and precision are crucial in academic writing, so let’s into the basics of tenses in your research paper and discuss the recommended tenses for each section.

Fix language and grammar, including tense errors, in minutes with Paperpal. Try it for free!    

The simple past tense: Literature review, methods

Use this tense in your research paper when talking of or describing specific actions or events that occurred in the past; they should not be linked to the present in the same sentence. The simple past tense is used predominantly in the literature review to talk about existing research on the topic, for example, “Watson and Crick published their landmark paper on the structure of DNA in 1953.” It is also typically used in the methods section to describe the methods used in previous studies; what you did and how you did it. For example, “We selected five samples at random.” This tense in scientific writing can also be used to state facts that were once believed to be true but have since been invalidated, for example, “Bats were thought to be blind.”  

The past perfect tense: Methods, conclusion

Best used to describe two related events that occurred at different times in the past, this tense is typically used in the methods section, especially when describing earlier stages of the experimental procedure. For example, “By the time the temperature and humidity reached optimal levels, the plants had already begun to revive,” or “Respondents who had been grouped into different control groups were given a placebo instead of the new formulation.” Use the past perfect tense in your research paper to describe research or experiments that may have already been completed at the time of writing the manuscript and in the conclusion to summarize the research findings.  

The simple present tense: Introduction, results, tables and figures

A researcher or academic writer can use simple present tense in the introduction when stating the objectives of the study, to interpret the results, discuss the significance of the findings or to present conclusions. Use the simple present tense in your research papers when referring to results presented in tables and figures in your writing. For example, “Fig.3 shows that…”. The present tense an also be used to talk about the research paper as a whole, for example, “Section 4.1 discusses…”. 

This tense in scientific writing is also used to state what is generally true and what is unlikely to change. For example, “The Earth revolves around the sun” or “Human babies generally start speaking when they are 2 years old.” This tense works well in the results section , which indicates what one believes to be true and relevant to the present research. For example, “Robinson maintains that soaking seeds in strong acid helps in breaking seed dormancy.”  

Avoid inconsistent verb tenses in academic writing. Check your writing with Paperpal now!

The present perfect tense: Introduction, literature review

The present perfect tense in scientific writing is used to talk about a past event that is linked to the present or to talk about trends or events that have occurred recently. One may need to use this tense in the introduction while providing a background to the study. For example, “The demand for more sophisticated 5G devices has increased significantly over the past few years.” Additionally, the present perfect tense is also used frequently in the literature review sections while referring to previous research that is fairly recent. For example, “Recent experiments on the samples collected have revealed high levels of saline.”  

The future tense: Discussion, conclusions  

Use the future tense in your research paper when describing events that are expected to occur in the future; this is not very common in academic writing. Typically, its use is limited to the discussion section toward the end, when one needs to make recommendations or indicate a future course of action based on the research results. It is usually recommended that parts of the conclusion section be written in the future tense. For example, “These research findings will open up new possibilities for the effective use of Epsom salt in agriculture.”  

Remember that the grammar and tense guidelines provided above are not hard and fast rules, which can make it more confusing, especially for those who do not have English as their first language. Ask peers to proofread your work carefully for incorrect or mixed tenses in a single sentence or paragraph or turn to trusted AI academic writing tools like Paperpal. 

How Paperpal can help you ensure correct usage of verb tenses in academic writing?   

Academic writing demands high-quality standards; it’s essential to adhere to grammar and style conventions. This ensures conformity with institutional and field-specific standards, and clarity in communicating what was studied, when it happened, and from which perspective the research is discussed. To determine the flow and coherency of your paper, using the right verb tenses is essential.  

Here’s how Paperpal, an AI academic writing assistant, can help you maintain consistency in verb tenses so that readers can easily follow the progress of your ideas and arguments: 

• Sign Up or Log In: Start by creating an account or logging into Paperpal . 
• Paste your content: Once logged in, paste your research paper’s content onto the writing document. 
• Get language and grammar suggestions: Click on the Edit icon on the right pane. Paperpal analyzes your text to identify errors, including verb form, tense usage, spellings, punctuations, word choice, and grammar. 
• Fix errors and review: You can accept the relevant suggestions, and reject the irrelevant ones, and correct all the errors in a go.  

Researchers need to familiarize themselves with the correct use of tenses in research papers, but with Paperpal, it gets easier. Paperpal is not just a grammar and language checker. It also provides rewriting, word reduction, and academic tone checks to align your writing with academic conventions. You can even build your writing skills and learn how to avoid such errors in the future with Paperpal’s detailed writing “tips” with simple explanations for editing suggestions.    

Understanding and implementing the appropriate use of tenses in different sections of your research paper is essential for effective communication of your ideas. By mastering the use of tenses in your research paper, you can ensure clarity, consistency, and accuracy and elevate the quality of your academic writing.  

Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.  

Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.  

Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!  

Related Reads:

• Differences Between Editing and Proofreading
• Raise vs. Rise: The Right Usage
• Is there a Difference Between ‘Among’ and ‘Between’?

How to Paraphrase Research Papers Effectively

Getting it right: inquire vs. enquire in research writing, academic translation and more: 4 ways paperpal meets real-world researcher needs , you may also like, what is academic editing why is it important , what are citation styles which citation style to..., how to structure an essay, mla works cited page: format, template & examples, powerful academic phrases to improve your essay writing , academic editing: how to self-edit academic text with..., how to use ai to enhance your college..., how to use paperpal to generate emails &..., word choice problems: how to use the right....