- University Libraries
- Research Guides
- Reviewing Research: Literature Reviews, Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews
- Differentiating the Three Review Types
Reviewing Research: Literature Reviews, Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews: Differentiating the Three Review Types
- Framework, Protocol, and Writing Steps
- Working with Keywords/Subject Headings
- Citing Research
The Differences in the Review Types
Grant, M.J. and Booth, A. (2009), A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. H ealth Information & Libraries Journal , 26: 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains.
- What Type of Review is Right for you (Cornell University)
Literature Reviews
Literature Review: it is a product and a process.
As a product , it is a carefully written examination, interpretation, evaluation, and synthesis of the published literature related to your topic. It focuses on what is known about your topic and what methodologies, models, theories, and concepts have been applied to it by others.
The process is what is involved in conducting a review of the literature.
- It is ongoing
- It is iterative (repetitive)
- It involves searching for and finding relevant literature.
- It includes keeping track of your references and preparing and formatting them for the bibliography of your thesis
- Literature Reviews (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) This handout will explain what literature reviews are and offer insights into the form and construction of literature reviews in the humanities, social sciences, and sciences.
Scoping Reviews
Scoping reviews are a " preliminary assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature . Aims to identify nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research)." Grant and Booth (2009).
Scoping reviews are not mapping reviews: Scoping reviews are more topic based and mapping reviews are more question based.
- examines emerging evidence when specific questions are unclear - clarify definitions and conceptual boundaries
- identifies and maps the available evidence
- to summarize and disseminate research findings in the research literature
- identify gaps with the intention of resolution by future publications
- a scoping review can be done prior to a systematic review
- Scoping review timeframe and limitations (Touro College of Pharmacy
Systematic Reviews
Many evidence-based disciplines use ‘systematic reviews," this type of review is a specific methodology that aims to comprehensively identify all relevant studies on a specific topic, and to select appropriate studies based on explicit criteria . ( https://cebma.org/faq/what-is-a-systematic-review/ )
- clearly defined search criteria
- an explicit reproducible methodology
- a systematic search of the literature with the defined criteria met
- assesses validity of the findings
- a comprehensive report on the findings, apparent transparency in the results
- Better evidence for a better world Browsable collection of systematic reviews
- Systematic Reviews in the Health Sciences by Molly Maloney Last Updated Oct 28, 2024 1279 views this year
- Next: Framework, Protocol, and Writing Steps >>
"How Do I?" @JWULibrary
Sample Question
- JWU-Providence Library
Q. What's the difference between a research article and a review article?
- 35 about the library
- 28 articles & journals
- 1 Borrowing
- 8 citing sources
- 17 company & industry
- 11 computers
- 1 copyright compliance
- 5 countries & travel
- 2 course registration
- 49 databases
- 3 education
- 1 Interlibrary loan
- 5 job search
- 6 libguides
- 9 market research
- 24 my library account
- 12 requests
- 26 research basics
- 21 research topics
- 2 study rooms
- 16 technology
- 7 textbooks
- 42 university
- 3 video tutorial
- 1 writing_help
Answered By: Sarah Naomi Campbell Last Updated: Sep 07, 2018 Views: 218399
Watch this short video to learn about types of scholarly articles, including research articles and literature reviews!
Not in the mood for a video? Read on!
What's the difference between a research article and a review article?
Research articles , sometimes referred to as empirical or primary sources , report on original research. They will typically include sections such as an introduction, methods, results, and discussion.
Here is a more detailed explanation of research articles .
Review articles , sometimes called literature reviews or secondary sources , synthesize or analyze research already conducted in primary sources. They generally summarize the current state of research on a given topic.
Here is a more detailed explanation of review articles .
The video above was created by the Virginia Commonwealth University Libraries .
The defintions, and the linked detailed explanations, are paraphrased from the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association , 6th ed .
The linked explanations are provided by the Mohawk Valley Community College Libraries .
Links & Files
- How do I find empirical articles in the library databases?
- Share on Facebook
Was this helpful? Yes 63 No 19
Comments (0)
Related topics.
- about the library
- articles & journals
- citing sources
- company & industry
- copyright compliance
- countries & travel
- course registration
- Interlibrary loan
- market research
- my library account
- research basics
- research topics
- study rooms
- video tutorial
- writing_help
Downcity Library:
111 Dorrance Street Providence, Rhode Island 02903
401-598-1121
Harborside Library:
321 Harborside Boulevard Providence, RI 02905
401-598-1466
- Location and Directions
- Off-Campus Access
- Staff Directory
- Student Employment
- Pay Bills and Fines
- Chat with a Librarian
- Course Reserves
- Interlibrary Loan (ILL)
- Study Rooms
- Research Appointment
- Culinary Museum
Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts
Writing a Literature Review
Welcome to the Purdue OWL
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.
Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.
Where, when, and why would I write a lit review?
There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.
A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.
Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.
What are the parts of a lit review?
Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.
Introduction:
- An introductory paragraph that explains what your working topic and thesis is
- A forecast of key topics or texts that will appear in the review
- Potentially, a description of how you found sources and how you analyzed them for inclusion and discussion in the review (more often found in published, standalone literature reviews than in lit review sections in an article or research paper)
- Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
- Analyze and interpret: Don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
- Critically Evaluate: Mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
- Write in well-structured paragraphs: Use transition words and topic sentence to draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.
Conclusion:
- Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance
- Connect it back to your primary research question
How should I organize my lit review?
Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:
- Chronological : The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure).
- Thematic : If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women.
- Qualitative versus quantitative research
- Empirical versus theoretical scholarship
- Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources
- Theoretical : In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research.
What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review?
Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .
As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.
Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:
- It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper.
- Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. What are they saying to each other?
- Look at the in-text citations in each paragraph. Are you citing just one source for each paragraph? This usually indicates summary only. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often
- Read more about synthesis here.
The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.
- Richard G. Trefry Library
Q. What's the difference between a research article (or research study) and a review article?
- Course-Specific
- Textbooks & Course Materials
- Tutoring & Classroom Help
- Writing & Citing
- 44 Articles & Journals
- 5 Artificial Intelligence
- 11 Capstone/Thesis/Dissertation Research
- 37 Databases
- 56 Information Literacy
- 9 Interlibrary Loan
- 9 Need help getting started?
- 22 Technical Help
Answered By: Priscilla Coulter Last Updated: Jul 26, 2024 Views: 236840
A research paper is a primary source ...that is, it reports the methods and results of an original study performed by the authors . The kind of study may vary (it could have been an experiment, survey, interview, etc.), but in all cases, raw data have been collected and analyzed by the authors , and conclusions drawn from the results of that analysis.
Research papers follow a particular format. Look for:
- A brief introduction will often include a review of the existing literature on the topic studied, and explain the rationale of the author's study. This is important because it demonstrates that the authors are aware of existing studies, and are planning to contribute to this existing body of research in a meaningful way (that is, they're not just doing what others have already done).
- A methods section, where authors describe how they collected and analyzed data. Statistical analyses are included. This section is quite detailed, as it's important that other researchers be able to verify and/or replicate these methods.
- A results section describes the outcomes of the data analysis. Charts and graphs illustrating the results are typically included.
- In the discussion , authors will explain their interpretation of their results and theorize on their importance to existing and future research.
- References or works cited are always included. These are the articles and books that the authors drew upon to plan their study and to support their discussion.
You can use the library's databases to search for research articles:
- A research article will nearly always be published in a peer-reviewed journal; click here for instructions on limiting your searches to peer-reviewed articles .
- If you have a particular type of study in mind, you can include keywords to describe it in your search . For instance, if you would like to see studies that used surveys to collect data, you can add "survey" to your topic in the database's search box. See this example search in our EBSCO databases: " bullying and survey ".
- Several of our databases have special limiting options that allow you to select specific methodologies. See, for instance, the " Methodology " box in ProQuest's PsycARTICLES Advanced Search (scroll down a bit to see it). It includes options like "Empirical Study" and "Qualitative Study", among many others.
A review article is a secondary source ...it is written about other articles, and does not report original research of its own. Review articles are very important, as they draw upon the articles that they review to suggest new research directions, to strengthen support for existing theories and/or identify patterns among exising research studies. For student researchers, review articles provide a great overview of the existing literature on a topic. If you find a literature review that fits your topic, take a look at its references/works cited list for leads on other relevant articles and books!
You can use the library's article databases to find literature reviews as well! Click here for tips.
- Share on Facebook
Was this helpful? Yes 8 No 1
Related Topics
- Articles & Journals
- Information Literacy
Need personalized help? Librarians are available 365 days/nights per year! See our schedule.
Learn more about how librarians can help you succeed.
Maxwell Library | Bridgewater State University
Today's Hours:
- Maxwell Library
- Scholarly Journals and Popular Magazines
- Differences in Research, Review, and Opinion Articles
Scholarly Journals and Popular Magazines: Differences in Research, Review, and Opinion Articles
- Where Do I Start?
- How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles?
- How Do I Compare Periodical Types?
- Where Can I find More Information?
Research Articles, Reviews, and Opinion Pieces
Scholarly or research articles are written for experts in their fields. They are often peer-reviewed or reviewed by other experts in the field prior to publication. They often have terminology or jargon that is field specific. They are generally lengthy articles. Social science and science scholarly articles have similar structures as do arts and humanities scholarly articles. Not all items in a scholarly journal are peer reviewed. For example, an editorial opinion items can be published in a scholarly journal but the article itself is not scholarly. Scholarly journals may include book reviews or other content that have not been peer reviewed.
Empirical Study: (Original or Primary) based on observation, experimentation, or study. Clinical trials, clinical case studies, and most meta-analyses are empirical studies.
Review Article: (Secondary Sources) Article that summarizes the research in a particular subject, area, or topic. They often include a summary, an literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
Clinical case study (Primary or Original sources): These articles provide real cases from medical or clinical practice. They often include symptoms and diagnosis.
Clinical trials ( Health Research): Th ese articles are often based on large groups of people. They often include methods and control studies. They tend to be lengthy articles.
Opinion Piece: An opinion piece often includes personal thoughts, beliefs, or feelings or a judgement or conclusion based on facts. The goal may be to persuade or influence the reader that their position on this topic is the best.
Book review: Recent review of books in the field. They may be several pages but tend to be fairly short.
Social Science and Science Research Articles
The majority of social science and physical science articles include
- Journal Title and Author
- Abstract
- Introduction with a hypothesis or thesis
- Literature Review
- Methods/Methodology
- Results/Findings
Arts and Humanities Research Articles
In the Arts and Humanities, scholarly articles tend to be less formatted than in the social sciences and sciences. In the humanities, scholars are not conducting the same kinds of research experiments, but they are still using evidence to draw logical conclusions. Common sections of these articles include:
- an Introduction
- Discussion/Conclusion
- works cited/References/Bibliography
Research versus Review Articles
- 6 Article types that journals publish: A guide for early career researchers
- INFOGRAPHIC: 5 Differences between a research paper and a review paper
- Michigan State University. Empirical vs Review Articles
- UC Merced Library. Empirical & Review Articles
- << Previous: Where Do I Start?
- Next: How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? >>
- Last Updated: Jan 24, 2024 10:48 AM
- URL: https://library.bridgew.edu/scholarly
Phone: 508.531.1392 Text: 508.425.4096 Email: [email protected]
Feedback/Comments
Privacy Policy
Website Accessibility
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter
- Study resources
- Calendar - Graduate
- Calendar - Undergraduate
- Class schedules
- Class cancellations
- Course registration
- Important academic dates
- More academic resources
- Campus services
- IT services
- Job opportunities
- Safety & prevention
- Mental health support
- Student Service Centre (Birks)
- All campus services
- Calendar of events
- Latest news
- Media Relations
- Faculties, Schools & Colleges
- Arts and Science
- Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science
- John Molson School of Business
- School of Graduate Studies
- All Schools, Colleges & Departments.
- Directories
- My Library account Renew books and more
- Book a study room or scanner Reserve a space for your group online
- Interlibrary loans (Colombo) Request books from external libraries
- Zotero (formerly RefWorks) Manage your citations and create bibliographies
- Article/Chapter Scan & Deliver Request a PDF of an article/chapter we have in our physical collection
- Contactless Book Pickup Request books, DVDs and more from our physical collection while the Library is closed
- WebPrint Upload documents to print on campus
- Course reserves Online course readings
- Spectrum Deposit a thesis or article
- Sofia Discovery tool
- Databases by subject
- Course Reserves
- E-journals via Browzine
- E-journals via Sofia
- Article/chapter scan
- Intercampus delivery of bound periodicals/microforms
- Interlibrary loans
- Spectrum Research Repository
- Special Collections & Archives
- Additional resources & services
- Subject & course guides
- Borrowing & renewing
- Open Educational Resources Guide
- Instructional Services
- General guides for users
- Ask a librarian
- Research Skills Tutorial
- Quick Things for Digital Knowledge
- Critical Toolkit for Navigating Information
- Bibliometrics & research impact guide
- Concordia University Press
- Copyright guide
- Copyright guide for thesis preparation
- Digital scholarship
- Digital preservation
- Open Access
- ORCiD at Concordia
- Research data management guide
- Scholarship of Teaching & Learning
- Systematic Reviews
- Borrow (laptops, tablets, equipment)
- Connect (netname, Wi-Fi, guest accounts)
- Desktop computers, software & availability maps
- Group study, presentation practice & classrooms
- Printers, copiers & scanners
- Technology Sandbox
- Visualization Studio
- Webster Library
- Vanier Library
- Grey Nuns Reading Room
- Study spaces
- Floor plans
- Book a group study room/scanner
- Room booking for academic events
- Exhibitions
- Librarians & staff
- Work with us
- Memberships & collaborations
- Indigenous Student Librarian program
- Wikipedian in residence
- Researcher in residence
- Feedback & improvement
- Annual reports & fast facts
- Strategic Plan 2016/21
- Library Services Fund
- Giving to the Library
- Policies & Code of Conduct
- My Library account
- Book a study room or scanner
- Interlibrary loans (Colombo)
- Zotero (formerly RefWorks)
- Article/Chapter Scan & Deliver
- Contactless Book Pickup
- Course reserves
Review vs. Research Articles
How can you tell if you are looking at a research paper, review paper or a systematic review examples and article characteristics are provided below to help you figure it out., research papers.
A research article describes a study that was performed by the article’s author(s). It explains the methodology of the study, such as how data was collected and analyzed, and clarifies what the results mean. Each step of the study is reported in detail so that other researchers can repeat the experiment.
To determine if a paper is a research article, examine its wording. Research articles describe actions taken by the researcher(s) during the experimental process. Look for statements like “we tested,” “I measured,” or “we investigated.” Research articles also describe the outcomes of studies. Check for phrases like “the study found” or “the results indicate.” Next, look closely at the formatting of the article. Research papers are divided into sections that occur in a particular order: abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references.
Let's take a closer look at this research paper by Bacon et al. published in the International Journal of Hypertension :
Review Papers
Review articles do not describe original research conducted by the author(s). Instead, they give an overview of a specific subject by examining previously published studies on the topic. The author searches for and selects studies on the subject and then tries to make sense of their findings. In particular, review articles look at whether the outcomes of the chosen studies are similar, and if they are not, attempt to explain the conflicting results. By interpreting the findings of previous studies, review articles are able to present the current knowledge and understanding of a specific topic.
Since review articles summarize the research on a particular topic, students should read them for background information before consulting detailed, technical research articles. Furthermore, review articles are a useful starting point for a research project because their reference lists can be used to find additional articles on the subject.
Let's take a closer look at this review paper by Bacon et al. published in Sports Medicine :
Systematic Review Papers
A systematic review is a type of review article that tries to limit the occurrence of bias. Traditional, non-systematic reviews can be biased because they do not include all of the available papers on the review’s topic; only certain studies are discussed by the author. No formal process is used to decide which articles to include in the review. Consequently, unpublished articles, older papers, works in foreign languages, manuscripts published in small journals, and studies that conflict with the author’s beliefs can be overlooked or excluded. Since traditional reviews do not have to explain the techniques used to select the studies, it can be difficult to determine if the author’s bias affected the review’s findings.
Systematic reviews were developed to address the problem of bias. Unlike traditional reviews, which cover a broad topic, systematic reviews focus on a single question, such as if a particular intervention successfully treats a medical condition. Systematic reviews then track down all of the available studies that address the question, choose some to include in the review, and critique them using predetermined criteria. The studies are found, selected, and evaluated using a formal, scientific methodology in order to minimize the effect of the author’s bias. The methodology is clearly explained in the systematic review so that readers can form opinions about the quality of the review.
Let's take a closer look this systematic review paper by Vigano et al. published in Lancet Oncology :
Finding Review and Research Papers in PubMed
Many databases have special features that allow the searcher to restrict results to articles that match specific criteria. In other words, only articles of a certain type will be displayed in the search results. These “limiters” can be useful when searching for research or review articles. PubMed has a limiter for article type, which is located on the left sidebar of the search results page. This limiter can filter the search results to show only review articles.
© Concordia University
- Interlibrary Loan and Scan & Deliver
- Course Reserves
- Purchase Request
- Collection Development & Maintenance
- Current Negotiations
- Ask a Librarian
- Instructor Support
- Library How-To
- Research Guides
- Research Support
- Study Rooms
- Research Rooms
- Partner Spaces
- Loanable Equipment
- Print, Scan, Copy
- 3D Printers
- Poster Printing
- OSULP Leadership
- Strategic Plan
Scholarly Articles: How can I tell?
- Journal Information
Literature Review
- Author and affiliation
- Introduction
- Specialized Vocabulary
- Methodology
- Research sponsors
- Peer-review
The literature review section of an article is a summary or analysis of all the research the author read before doing their own research. This section may be part of the introduction or in a section called Background. It provides the background on who has done related research, what that research has or has not uncovered, and how the current research contributes to the conversation on the topic. When you read the literature review ask:
- Does the review of the literature logically lead up to the research questions?
- Do the authors review articles relevant to their research study?
- Do the authors show where there are gaps in the literature?
The literature review is also a good place to find other sources you may want to read on this topic to help you get the bigger picture.
- << Previous: Journal Information
- Next: Author and affiliation >>
- Last Updated: Nov 14, 2024 12:40 PM
- URL: https://guides.library.oregonstate.edu/ScholarlyArticle
Contact Info
121 The Valley Library Corvallis OR 97331–4501
Phone: 541-737-3331
Services for Persons with Disabilities
In the Valley Library
- Oregon State University Press
- Special Collections and Archives Research Center
- Undergrad Research & Writing Studio
- Graduate Student Commons
- Tutoring Services
- Northwest Art Collection
Digital Projects
- Oregon Explorer
- Oregon Digital
- ScholarsArchive@OSU
- Digital Publishing Initiatives
- Atlas of the Pacific Northwest
- Marilyn Potts Guin Library  
- Cascades Campus Library
- McDowell Library of Vet Medicine
- UTEP Library
- UTEP Library Research Guides
PSYC 3101: General Experimental Methods
Empirical articles vs. review articles.
- Use Library Resources from Anywhere Off-Campus
- Search Tips
- Article Anatomy
- Use RefWorks This link opens in a new window
- University Writing Center
- What is a Peer-Reviewed Article Anyway?
Empirical Articles
Review Articles
What is a Peer Reviewed Article?
Peer review is a process that many, but not all, journals use. Article manuscripts submitted to peer-reviewed journals are not automatically accepted and published.
In peer review, a panel of experts in the given field review the manuscript to determine aspects such as the quality of research, appropriateness for the journal, and relevance to the field. One of three decisions is made: accept, reject, or revise based on commentary from reviewers.
The process of peer review is thought to help ensure that high quality articles appear in journals.
Another term for peer-reviewed is refereed . Peer-reviewed journals may also be called scholarly.
Remember that magazines, Internet sources, and books are not the same as peer-reviewed journals.
In psychology, articles that report on original/new research studies may be referred to as primary sources or empirical .
- Common sections in a research/empirical article include introduction, literature review, methods/process, data, results, discussion, conclusion / suggestions for further study, and references.
- If the article is not divided into sections, it does not automatically mean it is not an empirical article.
- You cannot assume that an article is empirical just because it is divided into sections.
- In the methods section [which may be called something similar], or otherwise usually toward the beginning or middle of the article [if it does not have sections]: The authors will describe how they actively conducted new or original research -- such as an experiment or survey. Examples of what would likely be explained: How they identified participants, that they received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, control vs. experimental groups, and so forth about their research.
Articles that either interpret or analyze empirical articles are considered review articles. Such articles are often referred to as secondary sources or secondary research.
- An entire article that is purely a literature review [usually a review of select other articles considered to be the best support for a research question/topic]
- Systematic review
- Meta-analysis / meta-analyses
- Meta-synthesis / meta-syntheses
- If an article is a review article, it is likely [but not always] to have the words literature review, systematic review, integrative review, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, or other mention of review in the title.
- The main indicator of a review article is if authors are just interpreting, analyzing, and/or comparing the results of empirical articles. So, in comparison to an empirical article, the authors of a review article do not describe an experiment or survey they conducted.
- If there is a methods section, it will usually describe how the authors searched for other articles [which databases they searched, what search terms they used] and decided the criteria for articles to include and exclude as part of their review. Again, they will not be describing how they conducted new or original research, such as an experiment or survey.
- In a literature review, for example, the authors' might point out what they believe to be the most pertinent/applicable research articles.
- << Previous: Use Library Resources from Anywhere Off-Campus
- Next: Search Tips >>
- Last Updated: Oct 1, 2024 11:00 AM
- URL: https://libguides.utep.edu/psyc3101
MSU Libraries
- Need help? Ask Us
Research Methods Resources - Kinesiology: Empirical vs Review Articles
- Finding Journal Articles
- Searching Indexes and Databases
- How to Locate the Full Text of an Article, once you have found the Citation
- Not sure if your Journal Article is considered Academic/Scholarly or Peer-reviewed?
- Obtaining Materials not Owned by MSU
- Connecting to Library Resources from Off Campus
- Empirical vs Review Articles
- Grants & Fundraising
- General Information
- Literature Review
- SAGE Research Methods
Empirical Journal Articles
Empirical Article - (Original Research) Based on experience and observation, rather than systematic logic. (according to MedicineNet.com)
The articles contain original research (such as scientific experiments, surveys and research studies) A list of references or sources is provided at the end of each article An editorial board, composed of experts in the field, reviews articles to decide whether they should be accepted; this is also known as "refereed," "peer-reviewed," "professional," "scholarly", or "academic". Uses a specialized vocabulary for that field.
Below are two websites that explain Empirical articles and research:
Empirical Research: How to Recognize and Locate (Penn State University) - Empirical Research PDF
Review Journal Articles
Review Article
An article that summarizes the progress or current state in some particular subject, area, or topic.
How to write a "Review Article?" (National Library of Medicine) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548566/
Subject Guide
- << Previous: Connecting to Library Resources from Off Campus
- Next: Grants & Fundraising >>
- Last Updated: Sep 16, 2024 1:15 PM
- URL: https://libguides.lib.msu.edu/c.php?g=96527
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Literature Review: it is a product and a process. As a product, it is a carefully written examination, interpretation, evaluation, and synthesis of the published literature related to your topic.It focuses on what is known about your topic and what methodologies, models, theories, and concepts have been applied to it by others.. The process is what is involved in conducting a review of the ...
Here is a more detailed explanation of research articles. Review articles, sometimes called literature reviews or secondary sources, synthesize or analyze research already conducted in primary sources. They generally summarize the current state of research on a given topic. Here is a more detailed explanation of review articles.
The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say "literature review" or refer to "the literature," we are talking about the research (scholarship) in a given field. You will often see the terms "the research," "the ...
A research article will nearly always be published in a peer-reviewed journal; ... For student researchers, review articles provide a great overview of the existing literature on a topic. If you find a literature review that fits your topic, take a look at its references/works cited list for leads on other relevant articles and books! ...
Review Article: (Secondary Sources) Article that summarizes the research in a particular subject, area, or topic. They often include a summary, an literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Clinical case study (Primary or Original sources): These articles provide real cases from medical or clinical practice. They often include ...
Scholarly literature can be of different types; some of which require that researchers conduct an original study, whereas others can be based on existing research. One of the most popular Q&As led us to conclude that of all the types of scholarly literature, researchers are most confused by the differences between a research paper and a review paper. This infographic explains the five main ...
A systematic review is a type of review article that tries to limit the occurrence of bias. Traditional, non-systematic reviews can be biased because they do not include all of the available papers on the review's topic; only certain studies are discussed by the author. No formal process is used to decide which articles to include in the review.
The literature review section of an article is a summary or analysis of all the research the author read before doing their own research.This section may be part of the introduction or in a section called Background. It provides the background on who has done related research, what that research has or has not uncovered, and how the current research contributes to the conversation on the topic.
If an article is a review article, it is likely [but not always] to have the words literature review, systematic review, integrative review, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, or other mention of review in the title. The main indicator of a review article is if authors are just interpreting, analyzing, and/or comparing the results of empirical ...
The articles contain original research (such as scientific experiments, surveys and research studies) A list of references or sources is provided at the end of each article An editorial board, composed of experts in the field, reviews articles to decide whether they should be accepted; this is also known as "refereed," "peer-reviewed ...